* Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use
[not found] ` <AANLkTinA3-KMPKJa-66QCMUpbDFwey2mjE=VN=9=zg=6@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-08-20 13:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-08-20 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Changli Gao
Cc: Eric Dumazet, Patrick McHardy, David S. Miller, netfilter-devel,
netdev, akpm, linux-kernel
[ executive summary: trying to explain why static variable declarations
within the body of functions is bad in kernel code. ]
* Changli Gao (xiaosuo@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I see. But I think the static variable should stay declared outside
> > of the function scope, with a nice comment explaining why it's not
> > initialized at init-time.
> >
> > Hiding global state in function code is usually frowned upon.
> >
>
> I don't agree with you. We'd better not expose the variable which
> isn't expected to be used by others. If not, maybe someone will misuse
> it.
We are talking about a static variable usable only within a single file,
where is the problem ? A nice comment can have this effect.
> The user should only reply on the interface, but not the internal
> implementation.
I'm talking about good practice to help code review. This is way more
important than the potential "encapsulation" benefit of hiding global
state (a static variable) within the body of a function.
I remember that Andrew Morton has strong opinions about this, and I
remember being in complete agreement with him on the topic.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread