From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoiding the same resource to be inserted
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100824164622.a3b2c1ed.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281974138-5553-1-git-send-email-shijie8@gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:55:38 +0800
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the same resource is inserted to the resource tree
> (maybe not on purpose), a dead loop will be created. In this situation,
> The kernel does not report any warning or error :(
>
> The command below will show a endless print.
> #cat /proc/iomem
OK, we shouldn't do that.
> So, adding the check for the same resource is needed for the stability
> and reliability of the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/resource.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 7b36976..60daab4 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static struct resource * __insert_resource(struct resource *parent, struct resou
> if (!first)
> return first;
>
> - if (first == parent)
> + if (first == parent || first == new)
> return first;
However, inserting the same thing twice _is_ a bug, and we shouldn't
silently accept it like this. We should tell the programmer!
But we can recover from the situation so let's not kill the box. How
does this look?
--- a/kernel/resource.c~kernel-resourcec-handle-reinsertion-of-an-already-inserted-resource
+++ a/kernel/resource.c
@@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ static struct resource * __insert_resour
if (first == parent)
return first;
+ if (WARN_ON(first == new)) /* duplicated insertion */
+ return first;
if ((first->start > new->start) || (first->end < new->end))
break;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-24 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 15:55 [PATCH] avoiding the same resource to be inserted Huang Shijie
2010-08-24 23:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-25 4:31 ` Huang Shijie
2010-08-25 15:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-08-25 5:03 ` Huang Shijie
2010-08-25 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-25 7:01 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100824164622.a3b2c1ed.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox