From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Herrmann3, Andreas" <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, "greg@kroah.com" <greg@kroah.com>,
"ksrinivasan@novell.com" <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] x86, tsc: Remove CPU frequency calibration on AMD
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:19:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100826071948.GA980@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282775588.4486.11.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com>
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 06:33:08PM -0400
>
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:28 -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > 6b37f5a20c0e5c334c010a587058354215433e92 introduced the CPU frequency
> > calibration code for AMD CPUs whose TSCs didn't increment with the
> > core's P0 frequency. From F10h, revB onward, however, the TSC increment
> > rate is denoted by MSRC001_0015[24] and when this bit is set (which
> > should be done by the BIOS) the TSC increments with the P0 frequency
> > so the calibration is not needed and booting can be a couple of mcecs
> > faster on those machines.
> >
> > Besides, there should be virtually no machines out there which don't
> > have this bit set, therefore this calibration can be safely removed. It
> > is a shaky hack anyway since it assumes implicitly that the core is in
> > P0 when BIOS hands off to the OS, which might not always be the case.
>
> Nice... this works for us too, we don't muck with that MSR bit either,
> its directly passed as is from the h/w to the guest. So no additional
> changes would be needed for us with this.
That's nice, KVM appears to not hit it either due to unsynchronized
TSCs.
> Hope that the 3rd time is a charm for you too :)
Yeah, I think it is :). Sorry for taking so long but removing code which
is actively executed from the kernel is not such a light decision. But
the hw guys made sure that this bit is always set so we don't need the
calibration. It wouldn't work in all cases anyway (hint: boosted cores).
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 19:25 [Patch] Skip cpu_calibrate for kernel running under hypervisors Alok Kataria
2010-08-16 23:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-17 5:51 ` Alok Kataria
2010-08-17 6:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-17 7:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-17 16:45 ` Alok Kataria
2010-08-17 18:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-18 16:16 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Limit CPU frequency calibration on AMD Borislav Petkov
2010-08-18 16:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-18 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-18 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-18 17:51 ` Alok Kataria
2010-08-18 18:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-24 15:53 ` [PATCH -v2] " Borislav Petkov
2010-08-24 17:51 ` Alok Kataria
2010-08-24 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-25 7:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-25 13:04 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-25 13:39 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-25 16:28 ` [PATCH -v3] x86, tsc: Remove " Borislav Petkov
2010-08-25 21:36 ` [tip:x86/cpu] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2010-08-25 22:33 ` [PATCH -v3] " Alok Kataria
2010-08-26 7:19 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-08-19 18:47 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Limit " john stultz
2010-08-19 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-19 20:52 ` john stultz
2010-08-17 16:48 ` [Patch] Skip cpu_calibrate for kernel running under hypervisors Alok Kataria
2010-08-17 16:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100826071948.GA980@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox