From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] oprofile: Handle initialisation failure more gracefully
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:38:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100827163839.GR22783@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282922125.22128.5.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 27.08.10 11:15:25, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > The current implementation is not entirely safe in the case that
> > > oprofile_arch_init() fails. We need to make sure that we always call
> > > exit_driverfs() if we've called init_driverfs(). Also, avoid a potential
> > > double free when freeing 'counter_config', e.g. don't free
> > > 'counter_config' in both oprofile_arch_init() and oprofile_arch_exit().
I am not sure if it is worth the memory handling code, we could
alternativly implement fixed size arrays with MAX_COUNTERS. This would
eas it a lot. But, this code will become generic, so we can stick with
this implementation.
But, cpu varables should be used, maybe with a later patch.
> > The root cause that makes this check necessary is that
> > oprofile_arch_exit() is called though oprofile_arch_init() failed. We
> > should better fix this instead. I have to admit we will then have to
> > check all architectural implementations.
> >
>
> I took a look through all of the oprofile_arch_{init,exit} functions
> and it looks like only ARM needs fixing. Nobody else does any allocation
> here [well, until Matt's unified version comes into play].
Great, many thanks.
> How about something like this? This removes the exit call
> from the init code and sets pointers to NULL after they have been
> freed. We still have to do some checking so that we don't try to
> release a NULL perf event:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> index 0691176..12253eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> @@ -275,10 +275,12 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void exit_driverfs(void)
> +static void __exit exit_driverfs(void)
> {
> - platform_device_unregister(oprofile_pdev);
> - platform_driver_unregister(&oprofile_driver);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(oprofile_pdev)) {
This check is obsolete here as we do not call oprofile_arch_exit() on
failure.
> + platform_device_unregister(oprofile_pdev);
> + platform_driver_unregister(&oprofile_driver);
> + }
> }
> #else
> static int __init init_driverfs(void) { return 0; }
> @@ -365,6 +367,7 @@ int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct
> oprofile_operations *ops)
> ret = init_driverfs();
> if (ret) {
> kfree(counter_config);
> + counter_config = NULL;
Dito, obsolete now.
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -374,8 +377,10 @@ int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct
> oprofile_operations *ops)
> if (!perf_events[cpu]) {
> pr_info("oprofile: failed to allocate %d perf events "
> "for cpu %d\n", perf_num_counters, cpu);
> - while (--cpu >= 0)
> + while (--cpu >= 0) {
> kfree(perf_events[cpu]);
> + perf_events[cpu] = NULL;
> + }
counter_config must be freed here.
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> }
> @@ -396,25 +401,27 @@ int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct
> oprofile_operations *ops)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void oprofile_arch_exit(void)
> +void __exit oprofile_arch_exit(void)
> {
> int cpu, id;
> struct perf_event *event;
>
> - if (*perf_events) {
> - exit_driverfs();
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - for (id = 0; id < perf_num_counters; ++id) {
> - event = perf_events[cpu][id];
> - if (event != NULL)
> - perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> - }
> - kfree(perf_events[cpu]);
> + exit_driverfs();
If we shutdown all this in reverse order, this should be after the
loop.
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (!perf_events[cpu])
> + continue;
Should be never NULL, the check can be removed.
> +
> + for (id = 0; id < perf_num_counters; ++id) {
> + event = perf_events[cpu][id];
> + if (event != NULL)
if (event)
...
> + perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> }
> +
> + kfree(perf_events[cpu]);
> }
>
> - if (counter_config)
> - kfree(counter_config);
> + kfree(counter_config);
> }
> #else
> int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> @@ -422,5 +429,5 @@ int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct
> oprofile_operations *ops)
> pr_info("oprofile: hardware counters not available\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> -void oprofile_arch_exit(void) {}
> +void __exit oprofile_arch_exit(void) {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS */
> diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c
> index b336cd9..3094af0 100644
> --- a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c
> +++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c
> @@ -257,15 +257,11 @@ static int __init oprofile_init(void)
> printk(KERN_INFO "oprofile: using timer interrupt.\n");
> err = oprofile_timer_init(&oprofile_ops);
> if (err)
> - goto out_arch;
> + goto out;
A 'return err;' here would remove the goto. I would preffer this.
Thanks,
-Robert
> }
> err = oprofilefs_register();
> - if (err)
> - goto out_arch;
> - return 0;
>
> -out_arch:
> - oprofile_arch_exit();
> +out:
> return err;
> }
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-26 19:09 [PATCH V2 0/4] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile Matt Fleming
2010-08-26 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] oprofile: Handle initialisation failure more gracefully Matt Fleming
2010-08-27 12:43 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-27 15:15 ` Will Deacon
2010-08-27 16:38 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2010-08-27 18:06 ` Will Deacon
2010-08-27 19:47 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-26 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] sh: Accessor functions for the sh_pmu state Matt Fleming
2010-08-27 13:43 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-27 19:17 ` Matt Fleming
2010-08-30 12:41 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-26 19:09 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] oprofile: Abstract the perf-events backend Matt Fleming
2010-08-27 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2010-08-27 12:44 ` Matt Fleming
2010-08-27 12:59 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-27 14:31 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-26 19:09 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] sh: Use the perf-events backend for oprofile Matt Fleming
2010-08-27 14:59 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-27 20:19 ` Matt Fleming
2010-08-31 11:28 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-31 12:23 ` Matt Fleming
2010-08-31 13:26 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-31 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] Generalise ARM " Robert Richter
2010-08-31 11:25 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100827163839.GR22783@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox