From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@excellency.fr>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] sched: On-demand cfs_rq list
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100828223547.016319253@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100828223025.054328145@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-tg-ondemand.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11706 bytes --]
Make certain load-balance actions scale per number of active cgroups
instead of the number of existing cgroups.
This makes wakeup/sleep paths more expensive, but is a win for systems
where the vast majority of existing cgroups are idle.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 86 +++++++++-------------------------------------------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched_rt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
* leaf_cfs_rq_list ties together list of leaf cfs_rq's in a cpu. This
* list is used during load balance.
*/
+ int on_list;
struct list_head leaf_cfs_rq_list;
struct task_group *tg; /* group that "owns" this runqueue */
@@ -1529,7 +1530,7 @@ static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_ta
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
+static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb);
static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
/*
@@ -1552,7 +1553,7 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_grou
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
update_rq_clock(rq);
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 1);
load_avg = div64_u64(cfs_rq->load_avg, cfs_rq->load_period+1);
load_avg -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
@@ -7553,15 +7554,13 @@ static void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
- struct sched_entity *se, int cpu, int add,
+ struct sched_entity *se, int cpu,
struct sched_entity *parent)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
tg->cfs_rq[cpu] = cfs_rq;
init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, rq);
cfs_rq->tg = tg;
- if (add)
- list_add(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
tg->se[cpu] = se;
/* se could be NULL for init_task_group */
@@ -7581,7 +7580,7 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct tas
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct rt_rq *rt_rq,
- struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu, int add,
+ struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu,
struct sched_rt_entity *parent)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
@@ -7590,8 +7589,6 @@ static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task
init_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq);
rt_rq->tg = tg;
rt_rq->rt_runtime = tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
- if (add)
- list_add(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, &rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
tg->rt_se[cpu] = rt_se;
if (!rt_se)
@@ -7700,7 +7697,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
* We achieve this by letting init_task_group's tasks sit
* directly in rq->cfs (i.e init_task_group->se[] = NULL).
*/
- init_tg_cfs_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, 1, NULL);
+ init_tg_cfs_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -7708,7 +7705,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
- init_tg_rt_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, 1, NULL);
+ init_tg_rt_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
#endif
@@ -7984,7 +7981,7 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
if (!se)
goto err_free_rq;
- init_tg_cfs_entry(tg, cfs_rq, se, i, 0, parent->se[i]);
+ init_tg_cfs_entry(tg, cfs_rq, se, i, parent->se[i]);
}
return 1;
@@ -8015,14 +8012,6 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
{
return 1;
}
-
-static inline void register_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -8074,7 +8063,7 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
if (!rt_se)
goto err_free_rq;
- init_tg_rt_entry(tg, rt_rq, rt_se, i, 0, parent->rt_se[i]);
+ init_tg_rt_entry(tg, rt_rq, rt_se, i, parent->rt_se[i]);
}
return 1;
@@ -8084,17 +8073,6 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
err:
return 0;
}
-
-static inline void register_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
- list_add_rcu(&tg->rt_rq[cpu]->leaf_rt_rq_list,
- &cpu_rq(cpu)->leaf_rt_rq_list);
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
- list_del_rcu(&tg->rt_rq[cpu]->leaf_rt_rq_list);
-}
#else /* !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
static inline void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
{
@@ -8105,14 +8083,6 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_gro
{
return 1;
}
-
-static inline void register_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
@@ -8128,7 +8098,6 @@ struct task_group *sched_create_group(st
{
struct task_group *tg;
unsigned long flags;
- int i;
tg = kzalloc(sizeof(*tg), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tg)
@@ -8141,10 +8110,6 @@ struct task_group *sched_create_group(st
goto err;
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- register_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- register_rt_sched_group(tg, i);
- }
list_add_rcu(&tg->list, &task_groups);
WARN_ON(!parent); /* root should already exist */
@@ -8175,10 +8140,12 @@ void sched_destroy_group(struct task_gro
int i;
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- unregister_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- unregister_rt_sched_group(tg, i);
- }
+ /*
+ * XXX should not be a race against enqueue, even without rq->lock
+ * because only empty groups can be destroyed.
+ */
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
list_del_rcu(&tg->list);
list_del_rcu(&tg->siblings);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
@@ -8256,7 +8223,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(shares_mutex);
int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
{
int i;
- unsigned long flags;
/*
* We can't change the weight of the root cgroup.
@@ -8273,19 +8239,6 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
if (tg->shares == shares)
goto done;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- unregister_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- list_del_rcu(&tg->siblings);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
-
- /* wait for any ongoing reference to this group to finish */
- synchronize_sched();
-
- /*
- * Now we are free to modify the group's share on each cpu
- * w/o tripping rebalance_share or load_balance_fair.
- */
tg->shares = shares;
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
/*
@@ -8294,15 +8247,6 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares);
}
- /*
- * Enable load balance activity on this group, by inserting it back on
- * each cpu's rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- register_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
- list_add_rcu(&tg->siblings, &tg->parent->children);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_group_lock, flags);
done:
mutex_unlock(&shares_mutex);
return 0;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -143,6 +143,23 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(
return cfs_rq->tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu];
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (!cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ cfs_rq->on_list = 1;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ cfs_rq->on_list = 0;
+ }
+}
+
/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
@@ -246,6 +263,14 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(
return &cpu_rq(this_cpu)->cfs;
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = NULL)
@@ -648,7 +673,7 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cf
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
{
u64 period = sched_avg_period();
u64 now = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock;
@@ -668,6 +693,11 @@ static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_r
cfs_rq->load_period /= 2;
cfs_rq->load_avg /= 2;
}
+
+ if (lb && !cfs_rq->nr_running) {
+ if (cfs_rq->load_period < (period / 8))
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ }
}
static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
@@ -729,7 +759,7 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs
reweight_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, shares);
}
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
{
}
@@ -859,7 +889,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
* Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
*/
update_curr(cfs_rq);
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
update_cfs_shares(group_cfs_rq(se));
@@ -873,6 +903,9 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
se->on_rq = 1;
+
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
+ list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
static void __clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -917,7 +950,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
se->on_rq = 0;
- update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
update_cfs_shares(group_cfs_rq(se));
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -183,6 +183,17 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct
return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+ list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
+ &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->leaf_rt_rq_list);
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+ list_del_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rt_rq, &rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, leaf_rt_rq_list)
@@ -276,6 +287,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct
return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void list_del_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+{
+}
+
#define for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) \
for (rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
@@ -825,6 +844,9 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct s
if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running))
return;
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ list_add_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq);
+
if (head)
list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
else
@@ -844,6 +866,8 @@ static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct s
__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
+ if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ list_del_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-28 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-28 22:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Try and make cpu-cgroup suck less Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Rewrite tg_shares_up Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-30 17:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-30 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-03 3:09 ` Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-09-03 3:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] sched: On-demand cfs_rq list Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-28 22:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: On-demand tg_shares_up() Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-03 1:52 ` Paul Turner
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100828223547.016319253@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pbourdon@excellency.fr \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox