From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"gorcunov@gmail.com" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ying.huang@intel.com" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"ming.m.lin@intel.com" <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
"yinghai@kernel.org" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nmi perf fixes
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:38:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901083808.GH22783@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283309806-21913-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On 31.08.10 22:56:42, Don Zickus wrote:
> Fixes to allow unknown nmis to pass through the perf nmi handler instead
> of being swallowed. Contains patches that are already in Ingo's tree. Added
> here for completeness. Based on ingo/tip
>
> Tested on intel/amd
>
> git pull git://fedorapeople.org/dzickus/
>
> Don Zickus (2):
> [x86] perf: rename nmi variable to avoid clash with entry point
> [x86] perf: fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf
> counter
>
> Peter Zijlstra (1):
> perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
>
> Robert Richter (1):
> perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 15 +++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Reviewed and tested. Looks good to me, thanks Don.
-Robert
>
> --
> 1.7.2.2
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 2:56 [PATCH 0/4] nmi perf fixes Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] [x86] perf: rename nmi variable to avoid clash with entry point Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] [x86] perf: fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf counter Don Zickus
2010-09-01 8:38 ` Robert Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901083808.GH22783@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox