From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752636Ab0ICEq6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:46:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:63071 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751432Ab0ICEq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:46:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=oEWQLpbRYTZKvfAbM4tUwEd1Wm/TzJD0B0DnkCR8OgVrSKw9A2Ld+letf50N35agBk OrH+iEpzFaPHVk8HuoMPbuI0YDnpLC7IvR6XO8jj+hNFueBQLBLKtfDddG3eidg2NoGl DHuHuuxhWfjA4vFco5N205iWgpUP/d1gxrqvw= Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:46:58 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Koki Sanagi Cc: David Miller , rostedt@goodmis.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets Message-ID: <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> References: <4C72422C.5070102@jp.fujitsu.com> <1283212210.3656.84.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4C80592B.2060406@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100902.191741.233696520.davem@davemloft.net> <4C806388.9020509@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C806388.9020509@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: > (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote: > > From: Koki Sanagi > > Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900 > > > >> Thanks many acks. and I have one question. > >> > >> These patches have several component. > >> > >> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component. > >> What tree is good to be included ? > >> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree. > > > > I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate > > for patch #1. > > > > O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip. No need, they apply very well :) I'll push that to -tip soon. Thanks.