From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756341Ab0ICJG3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:06:29 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:49467 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754432Ab0ICJGZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:06:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=osvk46kEFEc53FSlrIGqOYaB4PQQ/86bDZTFZAFAngMwMW65LyCr9hsm7vr6F7brBr BW+mhdyOvqJ+f6dqJMpgKecVaBvk8r+v19RC4XlHavxuUxsT48PC23g9KEznMzIY0Xt2 /qU/61ZaO3GN/bdRJMHTA0oqzSjsg/FeJ0qro= Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:06:20 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Plamen Petrov Cc: Eric Dumazet , Herbert Xu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug #16626] Machine hangs with EIP at skb_copy_and_csum_dev Message-ID: <20100903090620.GA6645@ff.dom.local> References: <4LwrqITm-eJ.A.r8G.eFueMB@chimera> <4AUWBNzTkbD.A.ey.cGueMB@chimera> <20100831192659.GA3093@del.dom.local> <1283338251.2556.124.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4C80AB34.20501@fs.uni-ruse.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C80AB34.20501@fs.uni-ruse.bg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:00:52AM +0300, Plamen Petrov wrote: > ???? 01.9.2010 ??. 13:50, Eric Dumazet ????????????: > > I confirm that the above patch applied on top of v2.6.36-rc3 does not > show the problems that all the kernels since v2.6.35 (both stable > and Linus' tree) had. > > My problematic machine has been running the patched 36-rc3 for 36 hours, > and couning, with "generic receive offload" enabled only my tg3 nic. > > Thank you very much for the wonderful job, Eric! > Thanks to you, too, Jarek! Not at all! I only messed up a bit :-( All credits to Eric and Plamen! Thanks again, Jarek P.