From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Nauman Rafique <nauman@google.com>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
arighi@develer.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Bio Throttling support for block IO controller
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:48:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903124815.GA12694@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C80C4FF.5090409@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:50:55PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently CFQ provides the weight based proportional division of bandwidth.
> > People also have been looking at extending block IO controller to provide
> > throttling/max bandwidth control.
> >
> > I have started to write the support for throttling in block layer on
> > request queue so that it can be used both for higher level logical
> > devices as well as leaf nodes. This patch is still work in progress but
> > I wanted to post it for early feedback.
> >
> > Basically currently I have hooked into __make_request() function to
> > check which cgroup bio belongs to and if it is exceeding the specified
> > BW rate. If no, thread can continue to dispatch bio as it is otherwise
> > bio is queued internally and dispatched later with the help of a worker
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
> I'd like to give it a try.
> In what manner the worker dispatch bios? FIFO? I have yet gone throught the patch.
>
Hi Gui,
Yes, the dispatch of throttled bios is FIFO with-in group.
Thanks
Vivek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 17:58 [RFC PATCH] Bio Throttling support for block IO controller Vivek Goyal
2010-09-01 20:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-02 15:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-02 16:22 ` Nauman Rafique
2010-09-02 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-02 17:32 ` Balbir Singh
2010-09-02 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-03 1:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-09-03 23:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-03 9:50 ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-09-03 12:48 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100903124815.GA12694@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox