Re: stable? quality assurance?

Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11T16:34:11Z

Le dimanche 11 juillet 2010 à 19:58 +0400, William Pitcock a écrit :
> ----- "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Something like 2.6.32.16 : Its probably more stable than all 2.6.X
> > kernels.
>
> 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable
> as a Xen domU. I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows
> what other regressions there are in .16.
>

Yea, strictly speaking, you can be sure no kernel will be bug free,
ever.

This is why I said "probably more stable" ;)