From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] therm_throt.c: Fix error handling in thermal_throttle_add_dev
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:32:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100905123229.GA8254@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100903213456.GA22124@fenghua-desk.sc.intel.com>
* Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> Or other options could be:
>
> 1. Just calling sysfs_add_file_to_group() without collecting returned error and
> return 0 at the end (driver/pci/pcie/aspm.c does like this). The drawback is
> there is no error logged if an unlikely errorr occurs. But user can see some
> files are missing in sysfs.
>
> 2. Or collect errors in err1, err2, etc for each sysfs_add_file_to_group. At
> the end, return -ENODEV(??) if any err1, err2, etc is not 0. This option makes
> code unreasonable complex to handle unlikely errors.
Well, the usual way to handle errors is to abort the operation when it
occurs, and return the error code that sysfs_add_file_to_group() gave.
The error is not 'fatal' but missing sysfs files sure are confusing, and
might break user-land which depends on them. So we should either
initialize a driver fully - or not intialize it at all.
Now, a sub-case is the question whether to emit something more than the
return code from sysfs_add_file_to_group(). If it's exceedingly rare
(and subsequently poorly tested) then adding a WARN_ON_ONCE(ret) is OK -
but that error code should be returned.
Am i missing any detail?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-05 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-03 0:45 [PATCH] therm_throt.c: Fix error handling in thermal_throttle_add_dev Fenghua Yu
2010-09-03 8:48 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-03 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-03 21:34 ` Fenghua Yu
2010-09-05 12:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-09-05 16:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100905123229.GA8254@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox