From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: paulus <paulus@samba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 15/19] perf: Move some code around
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:46:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907165012.049565075@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100907164633.879932949@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: perf-pmu-context-7.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6766 bytes --]
Move all inherit code near each other.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -5537,106 +5537,6 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_create_kernel_counter);
-/*
- * inherit a event from parent task to child task:
- */
-static struct perf_event *
-inherit_event(struct perf_event *parent_event,
- struct task_struct *parent,
- struct perf_event_context *parent_ctx,
- struct task_struct *child,
- struct perf_event *group_leader,
- struct perf_event_context *child_ctx)
-{
- struct perf_event *child_event;
-
- /*
- * Instead of creating recursive hierarchies of events,
- * we link inherited events back to the original parent,
- * which has a filp for sure, which we use as the reference
- * count:
- */
- if (parent_event->parent)
- parent_event = parent_event->parent;
-
- child_event = perf_event_alloc(&parent_event->attr,
- parent_event->cpu,
- group_leader, parent_event,
- NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(child_event))
- return child_event;
- get_ctx(child_ctx);
-
- /*
- * Make the child state follow the state of the parent event,
- * not its attr.disabled bit. We hold the parent's mutex,
- * so we won't race with perf_event_{en, dis}able_family.
- */
- if (parent_event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
- child_event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
- else
- child_event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
-
- if (parent_event->attr.freq) {
- u64 sample_period = parent_event->hw.sample_period;
- struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &child_event->hw;
-
- hwc->sample_period = sample_period;
- hwc->last_period = sample_period;
-
- local64_set(&hwc->period_left, sample_period);
- }
-
- child_event->ctx = child_ctx;
- child_event->overflow_handler = parent_event->overflow_handler;
-
- /*
- * Link it up in the child's context:
- */
- add_event_to_ctx(child_event, child_ctx);
-
- /*
- * Get a reference to the parent filp - we will fput it
- * when the child event exits. This is safe to do because
- * we are in the parent and we know that the filp still
- * exists and has a nonzero count:
- */
- atomic_long_inc(&parent_event->filp->f_count);
-
- /*
- * Link this into the parent event's child list
- */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(parent_event->ctx->parent_ctx);
- mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
- list_add_tail(&child_event->child_list, &parent_event->child_list);
- mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
-
- return child_event;
-}
-
-static int inherit_group(struct perf_event *parent_event,
- struct task_struct *parent,
- struct perf_event_context *parent_ctx,
- struct task_struct *child,
- struct perf_event_context *child_ctx)
-{
- struct perf_event *leader;
- struct perf_event *sub;
- struct perf_event *child_ctr;
-
- leader = inherit_event(parent_event, parent, parent_ctx,
- child, NULL, child_ctx);
- if (IS_ERR(leader))
- return PTR_ERR(leader);
- list_for_each_entry(sub, &parent_event->sibling_list, group_entry) {
- child_ctr = inherit_event(sub, parent, parent_ctx,
- child, leader, child_ctx);
- if (IS_ERR(child_ctr))
- return PTR_ERR(child_ctr);
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
struct task_struct *child)
{
@@ -5825,6 +5725,106 @@ void perf_event_free_task(struct task_st
put_ctx(ctx);
}
+/*
+ * inherit a event from parent task to child task:
+ */
+static struct perf_event *
+inherit_event(struct perf_event *parent_event,
+ struct task_struct *parent,
+ struct perf_event_context *parent_ctx,
+ struct task_struct *child,
+ struct perf_event *group_leader,
+ struct perf_event_context *child_ctx)
+{
+ struct perf_event *child_event;
+
+ /*
+ * Instead of creating recursive hierarchies of events,
+ * we link inherited events back to the original parent,
+ * which has a filp for sure, which we use as the reference
+ * count:
+ */
+ if (parent_event->parent)
+ parent_event = parent_event->parent;
+
+ child_event = perf_event_alloc(&parent_event->attr,
+ parent_event->cpu,
+ group_leader, parent_event,
+ NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(child_event))
+ return child_event;
+ get_ctx(child_ctx);
+
+ /*
+ * Make the child state follow the state of the parent event,
+ * not its attr.disabled bit. We hold the parent's mutex,
+ * so we won't race with perf_event_{en, dis}able_family.
+ */
+ if (parent_event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
+ child_event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
+ else
+ child_event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
+
+ if (parent_event->attr.freq) {
+ u64 sample_period = parent_event->hw.sample_period;
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &child_event->hw;
+
+ hwc->sample_period = sample_period;
+ hwc->last_period = sample_period;
+
+ local64_set(&hwc->period_left, sample_period);
+ }
+
+ child_event->ctx = child_ctx;
+ child_event->overflow_handler = parent_event->overflow_handler;
+
+ /*
+ * Link it up in the child's context:
+ */
+ add_event_to_ctx(child_event, child_ctx);
+
+ /*
+ * Get a reference to the parent filp - we will fput it
+ * when the child event exits. This is safe to do because
+ * we are in the parent and we know that the filp still
+ * exists and has a nonzero count:
+ */
+ atomic_long_inc(&parent_event->filp->f_count);
+
+ /*
+ * Link this into the parent event's child list
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(parent_event->ctx->parent_ctx);
+ mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
+ list_add_tail(&child_event->child_list, &parent_event->child_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
+
+ return child_event;
+}
+
+static int inherit_group(struct perf_event *parent_event,
+ struct task_struct *parent,
+ struct perf_event_context *parent_ctx,
+ struct task_struct *child,
+ struct perf_event_context *child_ctx)
+{
+ struct perf_event *leader;
+ struct perf_event *sub;
+ struct perf_event *child_ctr;
+
+ leader = inherit_event(parent_event, parent, parent_ctx,
+ child, NULL, child_ctx);
+ if (IS_ERR(leader))
+ return PTR_ERR(leader);
+ list_for_each_entry(sub, &parent_event->sibling_list, group_entry) {
+ child_ctr = inherit_event(sub, parent, parent_ctx,
+ child, leader, child_ctx);
+ if (IS_ERR(child_ctr))
+ return PTR_ERR(child_ctr);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
inherit_task_group(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *parent,
struct perf_event_context *parent_ctx,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-07 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-07 16:46 [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4 Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/19] perf: Fix CPU hotplug Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/19] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/19] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/19] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/19] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/19] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/19] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/19] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/19] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/19] perf: Remove the sysfs bits Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/19] perf: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/19] perf: Remove the swevent hash-table from the cpu context Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/19] perf: Per cpu-context rotation timer Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-07 17:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-08 13:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-08 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/19] perf: Per-pmu-per-cpu contexts Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/19] perf: Clean up perf_event_context allocation Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/19] perf: Multiple task contexts Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/19] perf: Provide a separate task context for swevents Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/19] perf: Optimize context ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 4:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4 Paul Mackerras
2010-09-10 7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-14 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100907165012.049565075@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox