From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757358Ab0IGWte (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:49:34 -0400 Received: from mx3.schottelius.org ([77.109.138.221]:37176 "EHLO mx3.schottelius.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491Ab0IGWtc (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:49:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:50:04 +0200 From: Nico Schottelius To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jeff Chua , Nico Schottelius , Jesse Barnes , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc3 suspend issue (was: 2.6.35-rc4 / X201 issues) Message-ID: <20100907225004.GA2805@schottelius.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nico Schottelius , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jeff Chua , Jesse Barnes , LKML References: <20100709170432.GA7691@schottelius.org> <201009062037.55898.rjw@sisk.pl> <201009072348.41344.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009072348.41344.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Netzseite: http://www.nico.schottelius.org/ X-System-Info: kr (Linux 2.6.34 x86_64) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:48:41PM +0200]: > On Tuesday, September 07, 2010, Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, September 06, 2010, Jeff Chua wrote: > > >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Nico Schottelius > > >> wrote: > > >> Same problem here. X201s. Haven't had time to bisect. > > > Somebody has already done that: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D128376394825563&w=3D4 > >=20 > > Rafael, > >=20 > > Cool. Thanks for the short-cut! At least now, I can resume, but got a > > lot of BUGS showing up upon resume after applying the patch. >=20 > This also was reported IIRC, but there's no resolution so far. It's a > different issue. Can somebody ping me, as soon as a git pull on linux-2.6 should be as "stable" (or more stable) than 2.6.34? Cheers, Nico --=20 PGP key: 7ED9 F7D3 6B10 81D7 0EC5 5C09 D7DC C8E4 3187 7DF0 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyGwZwACgkQ19zI5DGHffCpmQCg2HBLpiyQxRF/t40xs3Ruwsd9 FNsAoJBj0cZdcdNFe9+ndHeBxRxYYylz =2xzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--