From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Harald Gustafsson <hgu1972@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Harald Gustafsson <harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com>,
Song Yuan <song.yuan@ericsson.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: perf events over (net) console?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:40:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100909114053.GA15140@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100909112940.GA5267@nowhere>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:19:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:06 +0200, Harald Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We would like to monitor the perf events continuously on a remote
> > > machine. Does it exist a solution (in the kernel) to direct the
> > > output to a console or maybe even a netconsole? We would like to
> > > avoid a user space application to transfer it, due to that the
> > > machine will be running a test which will heavily load it and we
> > > want to avoid as many unrelated user space tasks as possible. If
> > > not mainlined does anyone have a patch for this?
> >
> > No, and its a daft requirement.
> >
> > You need a process context anyway to read the data and send it to
> > whatever place you want it.
> >
> > Putting that in-kernel serves no purpose what so ever.
>
> But if we bring the splice support, that can be done with minimal
> userspace noise. Plus that would work with the usual sockets but not
> limited to that.
Yes. If we can transform the data over the network without it touching
disk, then that would be a sufficiently 'does not disturb other tasks'
measurement method.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-09 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 11:06 perf events over (net) console? Harald Gustafsson
2010-09-09 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-09 11:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-09 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-09 11:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-09 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-09-09 12:31 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-09-09 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-09 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-09 13:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-09 14:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-09-09 17:42 ` Harald Gustafsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100909114053.GA15140@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song.yuan@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox