public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:39:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910043952.GA9100@drongo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100907164633.879932949@chello.nl>

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:46:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> These patches prepare the perf code for multiple PMUs.
> 
> About the first half of these patches deals with removing all the weak
> functions, the second half provides per pmu contexts.
> 
> New to the first half is Alpha, which got merged into mainline recently.
> 
> The second half is completely new and lightly tested, one known breakage is
> that it currently doesn't allow to mix software and hardware events into a
> single group (should be fixed soon).

I see Ingo committed this series into the tip perf/core branch.  Did
this problem get fixed before that, or does it still need to be fixed?

Paul.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-10  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-07 16:46 [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4 Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/19] perf: Fix CPU hotplug Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/19] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/19] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/19] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/19] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/19] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/19] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/19] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/19] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/19] perf: Remove the sysfs bits Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/19] perf: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/19] perf: Remove the swevent hash-table from the cpu context Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/19] perf: Per cpu-context rotation timer Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-07 17:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-08 13:50         ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-08 13:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/19] perf: Per-pmu-per-cpu contexts Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/19] perf: Move some code around Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/19] perf: Clean up perf_event_context allocation Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/19] perf: Multiple task contexts Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/19] perf: Provide a separate task context for swevents Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-07 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/19] perf: Optimize context ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10  4:39 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2010-09-10  7:43   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/19] perf pmu interface changes -v4 Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-14 16:56   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100910043952.GA9100@drongo \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox