From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754083Ab0IKDB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:01:28 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:44775 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753623Ab0IKDB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:01:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:56:11 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Cross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] west bridge, Kconfig fix Message-ID: <20100911005611.GA20937@kroah.com> References: <1284162665.16135.3.camel@odc-laptop> <20100911001005.GA20027@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:20:49PM -0700, David Cross wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:51:05PM -0700, David Cross wrote: > > > This patch fixes the currently broken Kconfig for west bridge by > > > introducing a dependency on a valid HAL Layer for the driver build. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Cross > > > Which order do these 4 patches need to be applied in? Please read > > section 15 in Documentation/SubmittingPatches for details as to how to > > properly format things. > > No ordering is necessary for these specific patches, they are all > independent. Ok. > Re-reading SubmittingPatches document, I am not totally sure if you are > referring to ordering (which is not needed in this case), or the actual > format in section 15. Would you like me to re-submit with a "from", empty > line, and a ":" in the subject? > Please let me know. No, that's fine, I was referring to the typical [01/04] numbering that people use to ensure both the order, and the fact that all patches go through. thanks, greg k-h