From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] x86/hwmon: avoid deadlock on CPU removal in pkgtemp
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:59:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100915015936.GE8081@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100915001259.GA1237@fenghua-desk.sc.intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:13:00PM -0400, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:11:05AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > pkgtemp_device_remove(), holding the list protecting mutex, calls
> > pkgtemp_device_add(), which itself wants to acquire the same mutex.
> > Holding the mutex over the entire loop body in pkgtemp_device_remove()
> > isn't really necessary, as long as the loop gets exited after
> > processing the matched CPU.
> >
> > Once exiting the loop after removing an eventual match, there's no
> > need for using the "safe" list iterator anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> > Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.36-rc4/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c 2010-09-13 08:45:03.000000000 +0200
> > +++ 2.6.36-rc4-x86-pkgtemp-remove-deadlock/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c 2010-09-03 17:54:30.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -339,17 +339,18 @@ exit:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > static void pkgtemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>
> I already sent a fix patch before. I'll push it to Linus.
>
Guess it got lost. Re-sending it might have helped, or adding an Acked-by to this patch.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-15 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-13 10:11 [PATCH] x86/hwmon: avoid deadlock on CPU removal in pkgtemp Jan Beulich
2010-09-15 0:13 ` Fenghua Yu
2010-09-15 1:59 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2010-09-15 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100915015936.GE8081@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox