From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753925Ab0IONXh (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:23:37 -0400 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:59336 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753113Ab0IONXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:23:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:53:24 +0930 From: Christopher Yeoh To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach Message-ID: <20100915225324.60280a50@lilo> In-Reply-To: <20100915081653.GA16406@elte.hu> References: <20100915104855.41de3ebf@lilo> <20100915080235.GA13152@elte.hu> <20100915081653.GA16406@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:16:53 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > btw., how does OpenMPI signal the target tasks that something > happened to their address space - is there some pipe/socket > side-channel, or perhaps purely based on flags in the modified memory > areas, which are polled? The shared memory btl signals through shared memory, though when threading is enabled (I think its mostly used with threading support disabled) in OpenMPI there is also signalling done through a pipe. Regards, Chris -- cyeoh@au.ibm.com