From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Sundar R IYER <sundar.iyer@stericsson.com>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FW: next build fails
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:35:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917103520.GA30330@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284674935.2411.54.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:08:55PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:58:57 -0700 Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, exactly .. This is what I did to update my patch .. Do you want to
> > > include this, or should I update my version and my tree.. Ultimately my
> > > version has to go into Russell's tree..
> >
> > Well, you can't really update that in your tree until after your tree is
> > merged with Russell's, right (since ALT_UP etc are not defined in your
> > tree)? In that case, I need to do the fix when I merge your tree into
> > linux-next (and so with Russell's tree).
>
> Right, I see what your saying .. Ok, thanks.
There is another way to handle this - we shouldn't be tinkering with
the aux control register on non-ARM cores (as we don't know what the
bits on such cores do) we could view this as a bug fix, and put it
into -rc.
I'd prefer to do that - so could you send the original patch you posted
to lakml to the patch system please?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <33A307AF30D7BF4F811B1568FE7A9B18043784FF99@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
2010-09-16 6:44 ` FW: next build fails Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 17:00 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-16 21:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 21:58 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-16 22:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 22:08 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-17 10:35 ` Russell King [this message]
2010-09-17 15:44 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100917103520.GA30330@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sundar.iyer@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox