From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753447Ab0IQKf4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:35:56 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:50050 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752457Ab0IQKfz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:35:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:35:20 +0100 From: Russell King To: Daniel Walker Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Sundar R IYER , Linus WALLEIJ , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: FW: next build fails Message-ID: <20100917103520.GA30330@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <33A307AF30D7BF4F811B1568FE7A9B18043784FF99@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local> <20100916164442.df749cc1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1284656407.2411.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100917075242.e0bc4b54.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1284674337.2411.53.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100917080439.7c35775a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1284674935.2411.54.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1284674935.2411.54.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:08:55PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:58:57 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, exactly .. This is what I did to update my patch .. Do you want to > > > include this, or should I update my version and my tree.. Ultimately my > > > version has to go into Russell's tree.. > > > > Well, you can't really update that in your tree until after your tree is > > merged with Russell's, right (since ALT_UP etc are not defined in your > > tree)? In that case, I need to do the fix when I merge your tree into > > linux-next (and so with Russell's tree). > > Right, I see what your saying .. Ok, thanks. There is another way to handle this - we shouldn't be tinkering with the aux control register on non-ARM cores (as we don't know what the bits on such cores do) we could view this as a bug fix, and put it into -rc. I'd prefer to do that - so could you send the original patch you posted to lakml to the patch system please? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: