From: Nils Radtke <lkml@think-future.de>
To: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel-Liste <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: inconsistent lock state
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:05:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917180553.GC11576@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009162018.16966.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Hi,
That msg appeared on one of our notebooks, one which is very
prone to panic. Because of that I switched the lock checking
on for .35.4 . The machine tends to die of sucking the batts
empty while sleeping over night (that batt is ok..). Or it dies
when resuming from suspend or when using Xorg (submitted already
a bunch of reports on various issues, this beast is picky).
.35.4 is the first .35 running on this machine. Sorry, I just
checked, I only activated it for .35.4 . Config for .34 had
it still disabled.
Amongst others, those are now active:
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
Would you mind giving advice on which else debug parameter
to activate w/o performance loss (it's a productive work place)?
Cheers,
Nils
On Thu 2010-09-16 @ 08-18-16PM +0200, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
# On poniedziałek, 13 września 2010 o 16:51:02 Nils Radtke wrote:
# > Hi,
# >
# > Got this in the logs:
# >
# > PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs7
# > PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcsa7
# > initialized framebuffer f62c8580 with backing bo f62c0080
# >
# > =================================
# > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
# > 2.6.35.4 #11
#
# Older versions works OK? eg. 2.6.35 or 2.6.34?
#
# --
# Maciej Rutecki
# http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-13 14:51 INFO: inconsistent lock state Nils Radtke
2010-09-16 18:18 ` Maciej Rutecki
2010-09-17 18:05 ` Nils Radtke [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-09 22:30 Arne Ahrend
2006-07-09 10:02 Arne Ahrend
2006-07-09 10:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100917180553.GC11576@localhost \
--to=lkml@think-future.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox