From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Seth Heasley <seth.heasley@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.35.4] irq: irq and pci_ids patch for Intel Patsburg DeviceIDs
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:21:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100924102146.445943b8@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100911105706.75c74a26@hyperion.delvare>
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:57:06 +0200
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:36:39 -0700, Seth Heasley wrote:
> > This patch adds the LPC Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Patsburg PCH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley <seth.heasley@intel.com>
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.35.4/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2010-08-26 16:47:12.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.35.4/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2010-09-10 16:34:06.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -2423,6 +2423,7 @@
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CPT_SMBUS 0x1c22
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CPT_LPC_MIN 0x1c41
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CPT_LPC_MAX 0x1c5f
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PBG_LPC 0x1d40
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801AA_0 0x2410
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801AA_1 0x2411
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801AA_3 0x2413
> > --- linux-2.6.35.4/arch/x86/pci/irq.c.orig 2010-08-26 16:47:12.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.35.4//arch/x86/pci/irq.c 2010-09-10 16:30:39.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH10_1:
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH10_2:
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH10_3:
> > + case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PBG_LPC:
> > r->name = "PIIX/ICH";
> > r->get = pirq_piix_get;
> > r->set = pirq_piix_set;
>
> Could Intel please stop using abbreviations for their chip names? If
> the chip is named Patsburg then please use PATSBURG in the symbol names
> too. MRST, PGB, etc. make me sick.
Agreed. Do you want to submit a rename patch for the existing stuff?
You can do it on top of this one if you like, I'll put it into
linux-next.
I guess this means more typing for you in future patches, Seth. :)
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 23:11 [PATCH linux-next.git] irq: irq and pci_ids patch for additional Intel Cougar Point DeviceIDs Seth Heasley
2010-09-10 23:36 ` [PATCH 2.6.35.4] irq: irq and pci_ids patch for Intel Patsburg DeviceIDs Seth Heasley
2010-09-11 8:57 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-24 17:21 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-09-24 18:03 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100924102146.445943b8@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seth.heasley@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox