From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755605Ab0IYP4K (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:56:10 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:55911 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753480Ab0IYP4J (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:56:09 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:55:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-rc3+; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , =?utf-8?q?M=C3=A1rton_N=C3=A9meth?= , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ian Kent References: <1285334543-7074-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1285334543-7074-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <201009251755.57690.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:nmMWXOHLXktu5AslW07njsFcEyifMRiPbO8yr9qVFKq Xye8cr8e+DPyGdnhZoX4IKw+vHAifwf+j7vvGPv4i1q3whRtDw HFZBlUhmN08ujJu76hz0MPrtcpkpEWTiyE4gP9HQ+2HfNT6lOq LZQcqAjr5w/3LvvCjyRwpMoSYG0IoMYKq/65E/cv7uPIKkMbz+ ZNiFQitt58uT6ZSfbD/ew== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 September 2010 15:22:22 Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > From: Márton Németh > > The patch solves the following warnings message when CONFIG_COMPAT > is not defined: > > fs/autofs/root.c:30: warning: ‘autofs_root_compat_ioctl’ declared ‘static’ but never defined > > Signed-off-by: Márton Németh > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann My initial reaction was to put these into my bkl/vfs tree, but then I noticed that they are against a 2.6.36 bug. Who's taking care of getting them upstream? - Ian (maintainer) - Arnd (who wrote the broken patch to start with) - Frederic (who pushed the broken patch to Linus) - Andrew (took them into -mm) I don't care either way, just trying to make sure it gets there and we don't all submit the same patch simultaneously. The current state is annoying but harmless, so I could also just add the patches to my 2.6.37 queue, which already has autofs patches for the BKL. Arnd