From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf: Wrap perf_lock_task_context using __cond_lock()
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927134641.GA5456@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285583997-1262-2-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 07:39:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> perf_lock_task_context() conditionally grabs ctx->lock in case of
> returning non-NULL. Rename and wrap it using __cond_lock to make
> sparse happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/perf_event.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index db5b560..c058a42 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static u64 primary_event_id(struct perf_event *event)
> * the context could get moved to another task.
> */
> static struct perf_event_context *
> -perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> +__perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> {
> struct perf_event_context *ctx;
>
> @@ -184,6 +184,14 @@ perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> return ctx;
> }
>
> +static inline struct perf_event_context *
> +perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_context *ctx;
> + __cond_lock(&ctx->lock, ctx = __perf_lock_task_context(task, flags));
> + return ctx;
> +}
That's a pity we need to make the code less readable just to make a tool
happy.
How do functions like mutex_lock_interruptible() that may
or may not lock? I don't see __cond_lock adds there.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-27 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 10:39 [PATCH 0/5] perf cleanups Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf: Wrap perf_lock_task_context using __cond_lock() Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 13:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-09-27 14:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-09-30 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf: Annotate lock context on perf_output_begin/end() Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: Remove 'extern' on hw_perf_event_init() definition Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf: Make perf_event_wakeup() static Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf: Declare hw_perf_{dis,en}able() in perf_event.h Namhyung Kim
2010-09-30 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-30 15:05 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100927134641.GA5456@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox