public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
	"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:40:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927144008.GA2577@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100927125946.GB2862@elte.hu>

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:59:46AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#endif
> 
> Hm, this tickles my uglo-meter. Is there no cleaner way, preferably one 
> that doesnt involve preprocessor directives?
> 
After looking through the code I thought about a much cleaner fix for
handling the SMP defines in coretemp.c and pkgtemp.c. Essentially
it will move all SMP dependencies into a single #ifdef, and also
optimize the loop in question with cpumask_first() / cpumask_next().
Maybe I can get rid of some of the SMP dependencies entirely. However,
the driver also uses phys_proc_id and cpu_core_id from cpuinfo_x86,
and those are only available if SMP is defined.

That would be way too invasive for .36, though. I'll stick with the
current patch and submit a cleanup for .37. That also fits well with
the other pending cleanups for the two drivers.

Thanks,
Guenter


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-27 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-27 11:59 [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-27 13:02   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-09-27 23:27     ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 23:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28  0:07         ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-28  0:26         ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-28  1:00           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28  1:12             ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 13:15   ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 14:40   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100927144008.GA2577@ericsson.com \
    --to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox