From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759326Ab0I0RvE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:51:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3339 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755266Ab0I0RvC (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:51:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:50:45 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: Robert Richter Cc: Huang Ying , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 3/7] x86, NMI, Rename memory parity error to PCI SERR error Message-ID: <20100927175045.GD26290@redhat.com> References: <1285549026-5008-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <1285549026-5008-3-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <20100927080106.GA32222@erda.amd.com> <1285576760.20791.70.camel@yhuang-dev> <20100927090056.GJ13563@erda.amd.com> <20100927153315.GB26290@redhat.com> <20100927164502.GS13563@erda.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100927164502.GS13563@erda.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:45:02PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > On 27.09.10 11:33:15, Don Zickus wrote: > > Well, what other info do we know besides that bit being set? (I wish we > > had more, but I don't think we do) > > We should keep printing the reason byte as it did before. oh right. Fair enough. Though in my experience, it always confuses people. They think they are getting different failures (0xa2 vs 0xb2 for example). Cheers, Don