From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:07:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100928000704.GB4875@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinDkJu2MSJM6bUpWJoB2XOD4LLf6GTPBX39wteD@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 07:44:01PM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Guenter Roeck
> <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:02:57AM -0400, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> >> +#endif
> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> >> +#endif
> >> >
> >> > Hm, this tickles my uglo-meter. Is there no cleaner way, preferably one
> >> > that doesnt involve preprocessor directives?
> >>
> >> Implement cpu_sibling_mask() on UP so that the loop goes away?
> >
> > So what is the take ? Looks like Linus won't accept my patch without someone
> > else signing off on it. If the uglo-meter prevents it from being accepted,
> > I'll be happy to submit the SMP cleanup patch instead. As I mentioned
> > before, I would prefer that to go into -next.
>
> I'd _much_ rather see cpu_sibling_mask() on UP, and just have the loop go away.
>
> But that would be a generic change. Something like the (UNTESTED!)
Which is why I didn't do it...
> attached. It returns a NULL, since it would always be a bug to
> actually _use_ the (nonexistent) mask. And that's fine for things like
> for_each_cpu() that will then happily ignore the mask.
>
> Ingo, does this make those randconfig things work? I think it's
> prettier than the horrible "sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_SMP around in
> random places".
>
> Linus
> include/linux/smp.h | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
> index cfa2d20..ad48077 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask, void (*func)(void *info),
> return smp_call_function_single(0, func, info, wait);
> }
>
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_sibling_mask(int cpu) { return NULL; }
> +
> #endif /* !SMP */
>
That works. Every other use of cpu_sibling_mask() is either in smp code
or surrounded with #ifdef CONFIG_SMP.
Ok, I'll submit another version of the patch with the generic change after
some more testing.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 11:59 [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-27 13:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-09-27 23:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28 0:07 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2010-09-28 0:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-28 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28 1:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 13:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 14:40 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100928000704.GB4875@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox