From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760495Ab0I1Bbz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:55 -0400
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:53479 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757677Ab0I1Bby (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:54 -0400
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:25:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
        "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'devel@driverdev.osuosl.org'" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        "'virtualization@lists.osdl.org'" <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
        Hank Janssen <hjanssen@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Rename camel case variables in channel.c  (updated
	again)
Message-ID: <20100928012540.GA5188@kroah.com>
References: <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289ED89CF@TK5EX14MBXC130.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289EDBC9E@TK5EX14MBXC130.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20100927011943.GA6936@kroah.com> <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289F076BD@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20100927061029.GC22319@suse.de> <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289F13EFE@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20100927193216.GA25924@kroah.com> <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289F19F42@TK5EX14MBXC130.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7289F19F42@TK5EX14MBXC130.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:59:33PM +0000, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 3:32 PM
> 
> > What's wrong with using 'git send-email' with your server?  Have you
> > tried that?  That shouldn't change the mime-type of the patch, and if
> > it
> > does, that would be grounds for a bug to be filed against such a server,
> > right?
> 
> I have sent the patch again with git-send-email. Is the email format correct
> now?

I do not know, as I did not recieve any such emails :)

Care to check that the messages really did get sent?

thanks,

greg k-h