From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit change
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:36:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100928173625.GD8950@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928101641.a2791513.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:16:41AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:10:59 -0400 Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> > o Currently any cgroup throttle limit changes are processed asynchronousy and
> > the change does not take affect till a new bio is dispatched from same group.
> >
> > o It might happen that a user sets a redicuously low limit on throttling.
> > Say 1 bytes per second on reads. In such cases simple operations like mount
> > a disk can wait for a very long time.
> >
> > o Once bio is throttled, there is no easy way to come out of that wait even if
> > user increases the read limit later.
> >
> > o This patch fixes it. Now if a user changes the cgroup limits, we recalculate
> > the bio dispatch time according to new limits.
> >
> > o Can't take queueu lock under blkcg_lock, hence after the change I wake
> > up the dispatch thread again which recalculates the time. So there are some
> > variables being synchronized across two threads without lock and I had to
> > make use of barriers. Hoping I have used barriers correctly. Any review of
> > memory barrier code especially will help.
>
>
> Hi,
> Has this report been addressed/fixed?
>
Hi Randy,
No. I was not aware of it. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. I will look
into it.
Vivek
>
> on i386:
>
> blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1abb8): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1b1dc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>
>
> on linux-next 2010-0924 and 2010-0927.
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 17:10 [PATCH] Various block throttling fixes Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkio: Do not export throttle files if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=n Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] blkio: deletion of a cgroup was causes oops Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] blkio: Add root group to td->tg_list Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit change Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100928173625.GD8950@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox