public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit change
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:36:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100928173625.GD8950@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928101641.a2791513.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:16:41AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:10:59 -0400 Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> > o Currently any cgroup throttle limit changes are processed asynchronousy and
> >   the change does not take affect till a new bio is dispatched from same group.
> > 
> > o It might happen that a user sets a redicuously low limit on throttling.
> >   Say 1 bytes per second on reads. In such cases simple operations like mount
> >   a disk can wait for a very long time.
> > 
> > o Once bio is throttled, there is no easy way to come out of that wait even if
> >   user increases the read limit later.
> > 
> > o This patch fixes it. Now if a user changes the cgroup limits, we recalculate
> >   the bio dispatch time according to new limits.
> > 
> > o Can't take queueu lock under blkcg_lock, hence after the change I wake
> >   up the dispatch thread again which recalculates the time. So there are some
> >   variables being synchronized across two threads without lock and I had to
> >   make use of barriers. Hoping I have used barriers correctly. Any review of
> >   memory barrier code especially will help.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Has this report been addressed/fixed?
> 

Hi Randy,

No. I was not aware of it. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. I will look
into it.

Vivek

> 
> on i386:
> 
> blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1abb8): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1b1dc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> 
> 
> on linux-next 2010-0924 and 2010-0927.
> 
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

      reply	other threads:[~2010-09-28 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-28 17:10 [PATCH] Various block throttling fixes Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkio: Do not export throttle files if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=n Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] blkio: deletion of a cgroup was causes oops Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] blkio: Add root group to td->tg_list Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit change Vivek Goyal
2010-09-28 17:16   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-28 17:36     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100928173625.GD8950@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox