public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: {painfully BISECTED} Please revert f25c80a4b2: arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure field initialization
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:11:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100928211106.GE19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim85sH_2o=xCiDuoQrHq_7ZL96Y91xQMGxUP5Fy@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:24:40PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It looks like that commit is indeed very misleading. The commit message says:
> 
>   "arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure field initialization"
> 
> but it is in fact not duplicate: there's two field initializations,
> but they are _different_. Looking at the patch, it has:
> 
>         .ndo_set_mac_address    = uml_net_set_mac,
> -       .ndo_set_mac_address    = eth_mac_addr,
> 
> so it removes the later one, but it is not at all clear which one the
> compiler actually used. My guess is that it used to use the later one
> (the standard eth_mac_addr function), and the patch made it suddenly
> use the uml_net_set_mac function.

C99 6.7.8p19:

	The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each
initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any previously
listed initializer for the same subobject[*]; all subobjects that are not
initialized explicitly shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects
that have static storage duration.

[*] Any initializer for subobject which is overridden and so not used to
initialize that subobject might not be evaluated at all.


IOW, it _must_ use the last one in such cases.

As for the driver, I smell an interface change (in eth_mac_addr() arguments)
that has been missed...  FWIW, grep through the tree shows one more instance
of eth_mac_addr() called with such argument and it's also in net_kern.c; there
we simply want memcpy() instead, since device is definitely not running at
that point and we'd done the validity checks earlier.

Not sure if we need lp->lock around that eth_mac_addr() call - not familiar
with the driver in question.  If we don't, we should switch to eth_mac_addr
for the method, indeed...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-28 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-27 13:17 {painfully BISECTED} Please revert f25c80a4b2: arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure field initialization Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-27 14:06 ` Phil Turmel
2010-09-28 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28 20:47   ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-28 20:51     ` David Miller
2010-09-28 20:57     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-28 21:00       ` David Miller
2010-09-28 21:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-29  8:34       ` [PATCH] um: Proper Fix for f25c80a4: " Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-29 15:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-30  2:28           ` David Miller
2010-09-29  8:41       ` {painfully BISECTED} Please revert f25c80a4b2: arch/um/drivers: " Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-29 15:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-30  2:27           ` David Miller
2010-09-28 21:11   ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-09-28 21:24     ` Al Viro
2010-09-28 21:42       ` David Miller
2010-09-28 21:51         ` Al Viro
2010-09-29 17:19           ` [uml-devel] " Renzo Davoli
2011-01-26 16:32   ` {painfullyBISECTED} " Emil Langrock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100928211106.GE19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox