From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
linasvepstas@gmail.com, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: asm-generic/unistd.h and glibc use of NR_ipc
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:55:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009291355.06512.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100929051631.GA8116@infradead.org>
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:05:13AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > Another point where I'd appreciate guidance from libc-alpha is the sysctl()
> > and ustat() APIs. The corresponding system calls are missing from
> > <asm-generic/unistd.h>, since they are deprecated and their functionality
> > is better provided by other means (/proc/sys, fstat). So I've simply had
> > them return -1 with errno == ENOSYS. Is there any reason to think they
> > merit more substantial work? One could imagine baking in some horrible
> > mapping of "integer names" into path components for a sysctl()
> > implementation and reading /proc/sys to provide results, or walking all of
> > the mount points looking for a matching device number to pass a name to
> > fstat(), but I'm not sure it's worth the bloat to the library.
>
> fstat does not replace ustat. ustat is a statf-subsystem by dev_t and
> is not replaced by anything. xfsprogs for example uses it to check if
> a given dev_t is currently mounted. Please add it to the generic code.
>
I didn't put it into the generic list because the man page claims
"ustat() is deprecated and has only been provided for compatibility.
All new programs should use statfs(2) instead."
I suppose that means we should change the man page as well, right?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 23:26 asm-generic/unistd.h and glibc use of NR_ipc Linas Vepstas
2010-09-28 0:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-28 8:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-28 13:05 ` Chris Metcalf
2010-09-28 15:52 ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-09-28 16:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-28 16:41 ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-09-28 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-28 16:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-28 16:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-28 16:52 ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-09-28 17:36 ` Linas Vepstas
2010-09-30 13:23 ` Chris Metcalf
2010-09-29 5:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-29 11:55 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-03-10 16:46 ` Linas Vepstas
2011-03-10 17:07 ` Chris Metcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009291355.06512.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox