From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: matt mooney <mfm@muteddisk.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/24] i2c: change to new flag variable
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100929155609.00a70ee0@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100926180726.GD8191@haskell.muteddisk.com>
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:07:26 -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> On 09:29 Sun 26 Sep , Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:12:17 -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> > > Sam had implemented these newer style flag variables a while back as an
> > > eloquent way of handling conditional flags. A lot of newer (and some older)
> > > modules and subsystems were using them already, so to provide uniformity and for
> > > an eventual removal of the deprecated flags, I converted all remaining instances
> > > to the newer style. (IMHO, I think it flows better with the way the rest of the
> > > build system works.)
> >
> > Fine with me. What's the planned merge path for this patch? Will you
> > push all the patches upstream yourself, or do you expect me to pick
> > this one?
>
> I was hoping subsystem maintainers would pick them up, but a lot of the patches
> have been acked without being applied. My new plan is to have the unapplied ones
> go through the kbuild tree. So you can either pick it up or just ack it.
I've picked the patch, it's now in my i2c tree, scheduled for merge in 2.6.37.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 19:17 [PATCH 01/24] base: change to new flag variable matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 02/24] char: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 03/24] dma: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 04/24] hwmon: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 23:54 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2010-09-27 15:04 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-09-27 17:23 ` matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 05/24] i2c: " matt mooney
2010-09-25 11:26 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-26 2:12 ` matt mooney
2010-09-26 7:29 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-26 18:07 ` matt mooney
2010-09-29 13:56 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 06/24] ide: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 20:01 ` David Miller
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 07/24] ieee802154: " matt mooney
2010-09-26 10:31 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 08/24] infiniband: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 09/24] input: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 10/24] isdn: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 20:01 ` David Miller
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 11/24] memstick: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 12/24] message: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 13/24] misc: " matt mooney
2010-09-28 13:02 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-09-29 22:55 ` matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 14/24] mmc: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 15/24] net: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:25 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-24 20:01 ` David Miller
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 16/24] pci: " matt mooney
2010-10-15 19:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 17/24] power: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 18/24] pps: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 19/24] rapidio: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 20/24] rtc: " matt mooney
2010-09-25 1:37 ` [rtc-linux] " Wan ZongShun
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 21/24] scsi: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 22/24] spi: " matt mooney
2010-10-08 18:33 ` Grant Likely
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 23/24] usb: " matt mooney
2010-09-24 20:02 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
2010-09-24 20:28 ` matt mooney
2010-09-24 23:21 ` matt mooney
2010-09-24 19:17 ` [PATCH 24/24] video: " matt mooney
2010-09-25 2:52 ` [PATCH 01/24] base: " Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100929155609.00a70ee0@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfm@muteddisk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox