From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754345Ab0I2QdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:33:10 -0400 Received: from am1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.205]:50182 "EHLO AM1EHSOBE002.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753971Ab0I2QdI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:33:08 -0400 X-SpamScore: -14 X-BigFish: VPS-14(zzbb2cK1432N98dNzz1202hzzz32i2a8h43h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-WSS-ID: 0L9IOMK-01-D94-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:32:46 +0200 From: Robert Richter To: Cyrill Gorcunov CC: Stephane Eranian , "mingo@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "yinghai@kernel.org" , "andi@firstfloor.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "ying.huang@intel.com" , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "ming.m.lin@intel.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "dzickus@redhat.com" , "mingo@elte.hu" Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Catch spurious interrupts after disabling counters Message-ID: <20100929163246.GO13563@erda.amd.com> References: <20100929125301.GG13563@erda.amd.com> <20100929125453.GH13563@erda.amd.com> <20100929150140.GK13563@erda.amd.com> <20100929151253.GL13563@erda.amd.com> <20100929152745.GC9440@lenovo> <20100929154528.GD9440@lenovo> <20100929155102.GE9440@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100929155102.GE9440@lenovo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Reverse-DNS: unknown Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29.09.10 11:51:02, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 07:45:28PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > ... > > Btw, since x86 architectural and p4 are using same tests for > > running I presume better to have some helper rather then > > open coded pile? I rather tend to merge the x86 and p4 handler, the code is almost the same. -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center