public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate / x86: Change RESTORE_MAGIC on x86_64
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:05:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009292205.45724.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009291258.06048.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 09/28/2010 04:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > 
> > > On x86_64 the configuration and version of the kernel that
> > > hibernates and creates a system image may be different from the
> > > configuration and version of the boot kernel that loads the image.
> > > So long as both these kernels are built with the same value of
> > > RESTORE_MAGIC, the image created by one of them should be
> > > successfully loaded and restored by the other one.
> > > 
> > > It wasn't necessary to modify RESTORE_MAGIC in the past, but now
> > > that we are adding compression to the in-kernel hibernate code,
> > > change the value of RESTORE_MAGIC so that earlier kernels don't
> > > try to load compressed images they can't handle.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct restore_data_record {
> > >  	unsigned long magic;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -#define RESTORE_MAGIC	0x0123456789ABCDEFUL
> > > +#define RESTORE_MAGIC	0x0123456789ABCDF0UL
> > >  
> > 
> > Two issues with this:
> > 
> > a) shouldn't we only set this when the image is actually compressed?
> 
> Well, in fact, this is a workaround, because the compression happens in a
> different layer.  However, that other layer doesn't have any compatibility
> checks (at least on x86-64), other than seeing that the image metadata
> don't make sense at one point.

Sorry, I was wrong.  This patch shouldn't be necessary, I'll send another one
that only touches things in kernel/power.

Thanks,
Rafael

      reply	other threads:[~2010-09-29 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-28 23:12 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate / x86: Change RESTORE_MAGIC on x86_64 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-28 23:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-29 10:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-29 20:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201009292205.45724.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=nigel@tuxonice.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox