From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932130Ab0I3Pdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:33:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:59892 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932117Ab0I3Pdu (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:33:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=CS7ucmR3N/eDG7LCKcxORS5V9I+VD9+d5AT1jzlU6QZdHGkhp75B2pvNkNHnPLs9IV Sh8HiEkSjq009MroWTA9dUW8hrSTuu9hfCo/to4IbVQhoiRpnL0KytFfcZNwJv40QRcu RXd0LqaDzQfSwO6Lb8zi2wH1ln7KjccGZZuCA= Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:33:37 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" , Arun Murthy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] power_supply: Add driver for TWL4030/TPS65950 BCI charger Message-ID: <20100930153336.GA5923@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1285618704-8985-1-git-send-email-notasas@gmail.com> <20100928060554.GF2702@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20100928084251.GC3900@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20100928090637.GD3900@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20100928094122.GA7081@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20100928112643.GC22734@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20100928133345.GA8575@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100928133345.GA8575@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:33:45PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: [...] > >>>Hm you are probably talking about TWL5031, which has redesigned > >>>charger block that is named BCC. TWL4030 charger is different, called > >>>BCI and requires software charger detection from what I see in it's > >>>TRM. > >> > >>ok, might be that I got confused. Then it's ok the way it is. So we need > >>other means to detect the charger :-p > > > >May we consider this as a minor issue that can be improved later? > > Sure, it's fine. > > >If so, I would like to apply it, but I'll wait a day or two for > >Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags to give the proper credits. > > Here you go. > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi Applied, thanks everyone! -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2