From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754470Ab0JAHyu (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:54:50 -0400 Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:60600 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751917Ab0JAHyt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:54:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:54:46 +0200 From: Florian Mickler To: Tejun Heo Cc: Maxim Levitsky , Kay Sievers , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] cdrom drive doesn't detect removal Message-ID: <20101001095446.042fd675@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: <4CA577E0.7020508@kernel.org> References: <1284284969.2928.18.camel@maxim-laptop> <1284511071.3551.1.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100915132731.GA20558@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1284589207.4672.3.camel@maxim-laptop> <1285069338.3124.4.camel@maxim-laptop> <1285110590.2822.9.camel@maxim-laptop> <4C99B25D.20805@kernel.org> <1285162900.3335.15.camel@maxim-laptop> <1285163911.3159.5.camel@maxim-laptop> <4C9B141F.3050908@kernel.org> <20100930083020.62b56218@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100930133823.39353d23@schatten.dmk.lab> <1285856252.26846.12.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100930164918.22f40a83@schatten.dmk.lab> <4CA577E0.7020508@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs31 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:55:44 +0200 Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On 09/30/2010 04:49 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > > Ok. I will reopen then. Is someone working on fixing this issue? > > > > If we leave it open, we wanna have an ETA for the fix so that people > > trolling the bugzilla know for how long they have to let this report > > simmer. > > I just started working on in-kernel media presence polling and it > shouldn't be too hard to distinguish ro-mount and burning cases and it > should be possible to keep polling for ro mounts. I think it's > already a bit too late for the next merge window but the one after > that would be a reasonable target. > > Thanks. > Ok, cool. Flo