From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754988Ab0JASyI (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:54:08 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:36385 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754667Ab0JASyG (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:54:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:54:04 -0500 From: Robin Holt To: Nathan Fontenot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Greg KH , Dave Hansen , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Robin Holt , steiner@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] v3 rename phys_index properties of memory block struct Message-ID: <20101001185404.GL14064@sgi.com> References: <4CA62700.7010809@austin.ibm.com> <4CA62982.5080900@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA62982.5080900@austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:33:38PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > Update the 'phys_index' property of a the memory_block struct to be > called start_section_nr, and add a end_section_nr property. The > data tracked here is the same but the updated naming is more in line > with what is stored here, namely the first and last section number > that the memory block spans. > > The names presented to userspace remain the same, phys_index for > start_section_nr and end_phys_index for end_section_nr, to avoid breaking > anything in userspace. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot Reviewed-by: Robin Holt