From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753535Ab0JDI3w (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 04:29:52 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:55220 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753146Ab0JDI3v (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 04:29:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:29:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-trivial tree with the hfsplus tree Message-ID: <20101004082944.GA15480@lst.de> References: <20101004104740.822b987d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101004033441.GA6867@lst.de> <201010041023.45694.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010041023.45694.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:23:45AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Christoph, are you planning to take care of freevxfs, too? I can't figure > out whether readdir and lookup actually need locking there. They shouldn't, but I'll take a look.