From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757374Ab0JDXQa (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:16:30 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:53193 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169Ab0JDXQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:16:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:16:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "N.P.S." Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-09-28-16-13 uploaded Message-Id: <20101004161600.8cdf4e0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4CA4E76E.1050602@gmail.com> References: <201009282344.o8SNiliN024981@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <4CA4D61C.2010909@gmail.com> <4CA4E76E.1050602@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:39:26 +0200 "N.P.S." wrote: > Here is a patch that removes duplicate includes introduced in -next and > -mmotm > > -- > Zimny Lech > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 1 - > arch/arm/mm/flush.c | 1 - > arch/xtensa/include/asm/coprocessor.h | 1 - > drivers/mmc/host/ushc.c | 1 - > drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h | 1 - > drivers/staging/batman-adv/soft-interface.c | 1 - > drivers/staging/bcm/headers.h | 1 - > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.h | 1 - > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_iw.c | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_dnld.c | 1 - > drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h | 1 - > drivers/staging/rtl8712/osdep_service.h | 1 - > drivers/staging/westbridge/astoria/gadget/cyasgadget.h | 3 --- > sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c | 1 - > 15 files changed, 23 deletions(-) Removal of duplicated includes is a somewhat dangerous thing. If someone else says "hey, there's a duplicated include" and then fixes it, and if this patch removes the other include then whoops, we broke the build. This has happened before. So I'd ask that you redo and resend this patch shortly after 2.6.36 is released please, so I can get it into mainline quickly thus minimising the opportunity for such breakage. > Signed-off-by: N.P.S. We prefer that signoffs have real names in them, please.