From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757419Ab0JDXn5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:43:57 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54045 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752521Ab0JDXn4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:43:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:43:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Zimny Lech Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-09-28-16-13 uploaded Message-Id: <20101004164325.e8df693f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201009282344.o8SNiliN024981@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <4CA4D61C.2010909@gmail.com> <4CA4E76E.1050602@gmail.com> <20101004161600.8cdf4e0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:33:25 +0200 Zimny Lech wrote: > 2010/10/5 Andrew Morton : > > Removal of duplicated includes is a somewhat dangerous thing. __If > > someone else says "hey, there's a duplicated include" and then fixes > > it, and if this patch removes the other include then whoops, we broke > > the build. __This has happened before. > > Yeah, right. > > > > > So I'd ask that you redo and resend this patch shortly after 2.6.36 is > > released please, so I can get it into mainline quickly thus minimising > > the opportunity for such breakage. > > Ok. Do you want patch against 2.6.36 mainline, -next or -mmotm? Mainline is OK, thanks.