From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758232Ab0JELk4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:40:56 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:58467 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751815Ab0JELkz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:40:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:40:47 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Len Brown Cc: Linux Power Management List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: PCI quirk to prevent Lenovo Ideapad s10-3 boot hang Message-ID: <20101005114047.GA29495@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100927135735.GA856@srcf.ucam.org> <20100930222946.GB23084@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:06:15AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > > we check (and clear) that bit only if the acpi tables > > > tell us to do so. > > > > Do the tables tell us to do so on this platform? > > In this configuration, yes, otherwise acpi_idle > would have failed in exactly the same way. So why is intel_idle not paying attention to what the platform is requesting? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org