From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: tlinder <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] Add usb_endpoint_descriptor to be part of the struct usb_ep
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:18:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101005131804.GA3548@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1010031201050.26676-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, tlinder wrote:
>
> > From: Tatyana Linder <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > Change ep_choose() and usb_ep_enable() prototypes to use endpoint
> > descriptor from usb_ep. This optimization prevents the FDs from handling
> > the endpoint chosen descriptor.
> > This optimization is not full though. To fully exploit this change one
> > needs to update all the UDCs as well since in the current implementation
> > each of them saves the endpoint descriptor in it's internal (and extended)
> > endpoint structure.
> > This patch is a preparation for adding SuperSpeed support to the gadget
> > framework.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tatyana Linder <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c
> > index a857b7a..6264fba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > *
> > * Copyright (C) 2003-2008 Alan Stern
> > * All rights reserved.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2010 Code Aurora Forum. All rights reserved.
> > *
> > * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>
> Speaking for myself only, I don't think people should add their own
> copyright notices in files to which they have not made substantial
> changes. A little code motion and a small API adjustment don't seem
> like large enough changes to justify this. Some of the other files in
> this patch have even smaller changes!
I agree. Tatyana, please work with your company's lawyers to properly
learn how to add this type of mark to a file in a manner that is
correct.
Hint, this way is not correct :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1286092800-29107-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org>
2010-10-03 16:35 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] Add usb_endpoint_descriptor to be part of the struct usb_ep Alan Stern
2010-10-03 19:22 ` David Brownell
2010-10-05 13:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-11-10 23:40 ` David Brown
2010-11-11 6:34 ` Tanya Brokhman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101005131804.GA3548@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.nazarewicz@samsung.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tlinder@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox