From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759795Ab0JFSoU (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:44:20 -0400 Received: from db3ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.144]:26958 "EHLO DB3EHSOBE006.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759780Ab0JFSoS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:44:18 -0400 X-SpamScore: -14 X-BigFish: VPS-14(zzbb2cK1432N98dNzz1202hzzz32i2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-WSS-ID: 0L9VTDL-01-R6M-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:44:07 +0200 From: Robert Richter To: Grant Likely CC: Paul Mundt , Matt Fleming , Will Deacon , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Deng-Cheng Zhu Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate init/exit Message-ID: <20101006184407.GY13563@erda.amd.com> References: <74092b0d162aafc21e408033cec6146e227363b5.1286222593.git.matt@console-pimps.org> <20101006133309.GP13563@erda.amd.com> <20101006144921.GQ13563@erda.amd.com> <20101006145311.GA3754@linux-sh.org> <20101006145903.GR13563@erda.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Reverse-DNS: ausb3extmailp02.amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06.10.10 14:23:17, Grant Likely wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > >> index b336cd9..76d97a5 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > >> +++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprof.c > >> @@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ static int __init oprofile_init(void) > >>  { > >>       int err; > >> > >> +     memset(&oprofile_ops, 0, sizeof(struct oprofile_operations)); > >> + > > > > Yes, this looks much better. Thanks Paul. > > oprofile_ops is allocated in bss and so is already zeroed. No need to > do it explicitly. Before oprofile_arch_init() it isn't necessarily needed, but we should definitely add it before oprofile_timer_init(). For code readability I would rather tend to let the first in too. -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center