From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752490Ab0JGRnA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:43:00 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:55565 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752191Ab0JGRm7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:42:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:42:56 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core kernel fixes Message-ID: <20101007174256.GG2434@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20101005191223.GA31795@elte.hu> <20101005210904.GQ2369@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101005220546.GS2369@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1286333814.4861.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101006045905.GE2553@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101006182049.GA16329@elte.hu> <20101006212722.GP2433@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101007081100.GA16539@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101007081100.GA16539@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:11:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:20:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > Ingo, I have this queued up at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git rcu/urgent > > > > > > > > It passes targeted testing. If Eric is OK with it, it is ready to be > > > > pulled. At least as soon as kernel.org gets it out to the mirrors. > > > > Commmit 773e3f9357. > > > > > > Now that the original fix is in Linus's tree, can the followup commits > > > wait until v2.6.37? > > > > > > Linus, Paul, what's your preference? > > > > I am fine either way. > > Ok, Linus released -rc7 which is probably the last -rc so to reduce > final-rc code flux i have pulled your fix into tip:core/rcu, for > v2.6.37. Ah, good, thank you! I am rebasing on top of that. Here is hoping that this approach quiets down the conflict in -next as well. ;-) Thanx, Paul