From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755501Ab0JHIFI (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:05:08 -0400 Received: from bld-mail17.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.102]:45749 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752490Ab0JHIFE (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:05:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:05:00 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator Message-ID: <20101008080500.GX4681@dastard> References: <1286515292-15882-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1286515292-15882-16-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20101008075320.GA30902@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101008075320.GA30902@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:53:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +static unsigned int last_ino_get(void) > > Shouldn't this be get_next_ino? Sure, that sounds better.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com