From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751966Ab0JKEsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:48:12 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:41481 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751533Ab0JKEsL (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:48:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:48:08 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Brad Boyer Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: aranym bug, manifests as "ida_remove called for id=13" on recent kernels Message-ID: <20101011044808.GI19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20101007174948.GT19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20101010144952.GF19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20101010235256.GG19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20101011024103.GH19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20101011043632.GA2566@cynthia.pants.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101011043632.GA2566@cynthia.pants.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:36:32PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > I presume the bug is that foo put the return value in %d0 while bar > should have its return value in %a0. This function isn't eligible > for the optimization being used due to this need to move the result > into a different register. Yes. > > Spot the obvious bug... BTW, why on the Earth does debian-ports m68k tree > > use gcc-4.3 with Cthulhu-scaring 700Kb gzipped patch and does *not* have > > gcc-4.4? > > I believe that gcc-4.4 for m68k is being held up by the TLS support patches. > While I haven't been personally involved to any great degree, I got the > impression that the work is pretty much done other than getting it included. What do autobuilders use, BTW?