From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de,
adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:24:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012002409.GH16442@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285332494-12756-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:18:03PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following set of patches implements VFS changes needed to implement
> a new acl model for linux. Rich ACLs are an implementation of NFSv4 ACLs,
> extended by file masks to fit into the standard POSIX file permission model.
> They are designed to work seamlessly locally as well as across the NFSv4 and
> CIFS/SMB2 network file system protocols.
>
> The patch set consists of four parts:
>
> The first set of patches, posted as a follow up, contains VFS changes needed
> to implement the Rich ACL model. The second set [1] contains the Rich ACL model
> and Ext4 implementation. The third set [2] contains mapping of Rich ACL to
> NFSv4 ACL (how to apply file mask to access mask) and implementation of
> Richacl ACL for NFS server and client.
That's the part I'd like to review carefully and haven't yet.
> The fourth set [3] contains POSIX ACL
> to Rich ACL mapping and its ext4 usage.
The one thing I remember not liking before was a flag that told the user
whether a given ACL was originally mapped from POSIX or not. Is that
still there?
Overall I'm for doing this: I don't like NFSv4/Windows ACLs more than
anyone else, but they're too useful to ignore, and the mapping that
Samba and the NFSv4 server try to do is painful for users.
--b.
>
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-minimal
> [2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-upstream
> [3] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-fullset
>
> A user-space utility for displaying and changing richacls is available at [4]
> (a number of examples can be found at http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/examples.html).
>
> [4] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/richacl.git master
>
> To test richacl on ext4 use -o richacl mount option. This mount option may later be
> dropped in favour of a feature flag.
>
> More details regarding richacl can be found at
> http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/
>
> Changes from V3:
> a) Droped may_delete and may_create inode operations callback and reworked
> the patch series to use additional check flags.
> b) Rebased to the latest kernel
> c) The patch series now contain only the minimal VFS changes.
>
> Changes from V2:
> 1) Git repo include check-acl branch that drop newly added inode_operations
> callback in favour for additional access check flags (MAY_CREATE_FILE,
> MAY_CREATE_DIR, MAY_DELETE_CHILD, MAY_DELETE_SELF, MAY_TAKE_OWNERSHIP,
> MAY_CHMOD, and MAY_SET_TIMES)
> 2) richacl is now cached in the vfs inode instead of file system inode.
> (currently kept as a separate patch. We may want to fold that later)
> 3) Added a new acl flag ACL4_MASKED. richacl_apply_masks() can skip transforming acls
> without this flag, which speeds things up and avoids modifying those acls unnecessarily.
> 4) Owner always allowed permissions are now explicitly included when synthesizing an acl
> from file mode.
>
> Changes from V1:
> 1) Split the patches into smaller patches
> 2) Added extensive documentation to the patches.
>
> -aneesh
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 12:48 [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 01/11] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 02/11] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 03/11] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 04/11] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 05/11] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 06/11] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 07/11] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:50 ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 18:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-27 13:03 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 08/11] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:54 ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 19:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 19:23 ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-27 13:14 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-01-02 23:21 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-03 5:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 5:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 14:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 09/11] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 10/11] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 11/11] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-10-12 0:24 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-10-12 7:17 ` [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-10-12 15:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-25 19:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 4:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-11-01 15:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012002409.GH16442@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox