public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de,
	adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V4 00/11]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:24:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012002409.GH16442@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285332494-12756-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:18:03PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The following set of patches implements VFS changes needed to implement
> a new acl model for linux. Rich ACLs are an implementation of NFSv4 ACLs,
> extended by file masks to fit into the standard POSIX file permission model.
> They are designed to work seamlessly locally as well as across the NFSv4 and
> CIFS/SMB2 network file system protocols.
> 
> The patch set consists of four parts:
> 
> The first set of patches, posted as a follow up, contains VFS changes needed
> to implement the Rich ACL model. The second set [1] contains the Rich ACL model
> and Ext4 implementation. The third set [2] contains mapping of Rich ACL to
> NFSv4 ACL (how to apply file mask to access mask) and implementation of
> Richacl ACL for NFS server and client.

That's the part I'd like to review carefully and haven't yet.

> The fourth set [3] contains POSIX ACL
> to Rich ACL mapping and its ext4 usage.

The one thing I remember not liking before was a flag that told the user
whether a given ACL was originally mapped from POSIX or not.  Is that
still there?

Overall I'm for doing this: I don't like NFSv4/Windows ACLs more than
anyone else, but they're too useful to ignore, and the mapping that
Samba and the NFSv4 server try to do is painful for users.

--b.

> 
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-minimal
> [2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-upstream
> [3] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux-2.6-richacl.git richacl-fullset
> 
> A user-space utility for displaying and changing richacls is available at [4]
> (a number of examples can be found at http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/examples.html).
> 
> [4] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/richacl.git master
> 
> To test richacl on ext4 use -o richacl mount option. This mount option may later be
> dropped in favour of a feature flag.
> 
> More details regarding richacl can be found at 
> http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/
> 
> Changes from V3:
> a) Droped may_delete and may_create inode operations callback and reworked
>    the patch series to use additional check flags. 
> b) Rebased to the latest kernel
> c) The patch series now contain only the minimal VFS changes.
> 
> Changes from V2:
> 1) Git repo include check-acl branch that drop newly added inode_operations
>    callback in favour for additional access check flags (MAY_CREATE_FILE,
>    MAY_CREATE_DIR, MAY_DELETE_CHILD, MAY_DELETE_SELF, MAY_TAKE_OWNERSHIP,
>    MAY_CHMOD, and MAY_SET_TIMES)
> 2) richacl is now cached in the vfs inode instead of file system inode.
>    (currently kept as a separate patch. We may want to fold that later)
> 3) Added a new acl flag ACL4_MASKED. richacl_apply_masks() can skip transforming acls
>    without this flag, which speeds things up and avoids modifying those acls unnecessarily.
> 4) Owner always allowed permissions are now explicitly included when synthesizing an acl
>    from file mode.
> 
> Changes from V1:
> 1) Split the patches into smaller patches
> 2) Added extensive documentation to the patches.
> 
> -aneesh
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-24 12:48 [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 01/11] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 02/11] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 03/11] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 04/11] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 05/11] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 06/11] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 07/11] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:50   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 18:55     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-27 13:03       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 08/11] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:54   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 19:16     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 19:23       ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-27 13:14     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-01-02 23:21       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-03  5:20         ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03  5:59           ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 14:20         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 09/11] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 10/11] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 11/11] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-10-12  0:24 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-10-12  7:17   ` [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-10-12 15:35     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-25 19:09       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26  4:35         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-11-01 15:30           ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101012002409.GH16442@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox