From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
efault@gmx.de, kernel@kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH try 5] CFS: Add hierarchical tree-based penalty.
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012094735.GH20366@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8358526.1721286876359420.JavaMail.root@ifrit.dereferenced.org>
* William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > * William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Inspired by the recent change to BFS by Con Kolivas, this patch
> > causes
> > > vruntime to be penalized based on parent depth from their root task
> >
> > > group.
> > >
> > > I have, for the moment, decided to make it a default feature since
> > the
> > > design of CFS ensures that broken applications depending on task
> > > enqueue behaviour behaving traditionally will continue to work.
> >
> > Just curious, is this v5 submission a reply to Peter's earlier review
> > of
> > your v3 patch? If yes then please explicitly outline the changes you
> > did
> > so that Peter and others do not have to guess about the direction your
> >
> > work is taking.
>
> I just did that in the email I just sent. Simply put, I was talking
> with Con a few weeks ago about the concept of having a maximum amount
> of service for all threads belonging to a process. This did not work
> out so well, so Con proposed penalizing based on fork depth, which
> still allows us to maintain interactivity with make -j64 running in
> the background.
>
> Actually, I lie: it works great for server scenarios where you have
> some sysadmin also running azureus. Azureus gets penalized instead,
> but other apps like audacious get penalized too.
Thanks for the explanation!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 5:32 [PATCH try 5] CFS: Add hierarchical tree-based penalty William Pitcock
2010-10-12 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-12 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 9:39 ` William Pitcock
2010-10-12 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-10-12 9:57 ` Con Kolivas
2010-10-12 10:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-12 10:26 ` Con Kolivas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-12 5:32 William Pitcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012094735.GH20366@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nenolod@dereferenced.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox