public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@samsung.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ASoC: soc: snprintf() doesn't return negative
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:56:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012095605.GC30933@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hvd57eo60.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> Argh, yes, I'm (again) confused by that behavior.
> The problem is the potential buffer overflow, indeed.  snprintf()
> returns the size that would be printed.  Thus a safe code would be
> like:
> 
> 	list_for_each_entry(dai, &dai_list, list) {
>  		int len = snprintf(buf + ret, PAGE_SIZE - ret, "%s\n", dai->name);
>  		if (len < 0)
>  			continue;
>  		ret += len;
> 		if (ret >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> 			ret = PAGE_SIZE;
> 			break;
> 		}
> 	}

Yes, this form is better for that variant of the loop - that is safe and
legible without relying on current implementation details of snprintf().

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20101011035416.GD5851@bicker>
     [not found] ` <20101011104009.GB9231@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
2010-10-11 16:40   ` [patch] ASoC: soc: snprintf() doesn't return negative Dan Carpenter
2010-10-11 18:51     ` Mark Brown
2010-10-11 19:45       ` Dan Carpenter
2010-10-11 20:57         ` Takashi Iwai
2010-10-12  9:35           ` Mark Brown
2010-10-12  9:49             ` Takashi Iwai
2010-10-12  9:56               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-10-12 10:40                 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-10-11 21:11         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101012095605.GC30933@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=jassi.brar@samsung.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox