From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: get_user_pages -> get_user_pages_fast
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:52:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012115257.GA24389@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286818496.1998.43.camel@laptop>
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:34:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 18:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > There doesn't seem to be any advantage to using
> > get_user_pages, so switch iovlock to get_user_pages_fast
> > instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Lightly tested. This patch is on top of the bugfix patch I posted
> > previously.
> >
> > drivers/dma/iovlock.c | 10 ++--------
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/iovlock.c b/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
> > index 21ed8f3..c6917e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
> > @@ -95,17 +95,11 @@ struct dma_pinned_list *dma_pin_iovec_pages(struct iovec *iov, size_t len)
> > pages += page_list->nr_pages;
> >
> > /* pin pages down */
> > - down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> > - ret = get_user_pages(
> > - current,
> > - current->mm,
> > + ret = get_user_pages_fast(
> > (unsigned long) iov[i].iov_base,
> > page_list->nr_pages,
>
> What's the actual nr_pages here? Is it limited to some small number or
> can it be arbitrarily large?
> > 1, /* write */
> > - 0, /* force */
> > - page_list->pages,
> > - NULL);
> > - up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> > + page_list->pages);
> >
> > if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> > goto unpin;
>
I think it can get arbitrarily large: just above this is this code:
len -= iov[i].iov_len;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, iov[i].iov_base, iov[i].iov_len))
goto unpin;
page_list->nr_pages = num_pages_spanned(&iov[i]);
part of this is a bug: we should be locking at most len bytes.
This could be solved by an untested patch below.
Comments?
We probably should set a limit on the number of pages, too:
currently there could be a large # of very small chunks in the iovec.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/dma/iovlock.c b/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
index 121d7fd..1032f7b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/iovlock.c
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
-static int num_pages_spanned(struct iovec *iov)
+static int num_pages_spanned(void __user *iov_base, size_t iov_len)
{
return
- ((PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)iov->iov_base + iov->iov_len) -
- ((unsigned long)iov->iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ ((PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)iov_base + iov_len) -
+ ((unsigned long)iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
/*
@@ -54,19 +54,21 @@ struct dma_pinned_list *dma_pin_iovec_pages(struct iovec *iov, size_t len)
int i;
int ret;
int nr_iovecs = 0;
- int iovec_len_used = 0;
int iovec_pages_used = 0;
+ size_t l = len;
/* don't pin down non-user-based iovecs */
if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
return NULL;
/* determine how many iovecs/pages there are, up front */
- do {
- iovec_len_used += iov[nr_iovecs].iov_len;
- iovec_pages_used += num_pages_spanned(&iov[nr_iovecs]);
+ while (l) {
+ size_t s = min(l, iov[nr_iovecs].iov_len);
+ l -= s;
+ iovec_pages_used += num_pages_spanned(iov[nr_iovecs].iov_base,
+ s);
nr_iovecs++;
- } while (iovec_len_used < len);
+ }
/* single kmalloc for pinned list, page_list[], and the page arrays */
local_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*local_list)
@@ -82,13 +84,14 @@ struct dma_pinned_list *dma_pin_iovec_pages(struct iovec *iov, size_t len)
for (i = 0; i < nr_iovecs; i++) {
struct dma_page_list *page_list = &local_list->page_list[i];
+ size_t s = min(len, iov[nr_iovecs].iov_len);
- len -= iov[i].iov_len;
+ len -= s;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, iov[i].iov_base, iov[i].iov_len))
+ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, iov[i].iov_base, s))
goto unpin;
- page_list->nr_pages = num_pages_spanned(&iov[i]);
+ page_list->nr_pages = num_pages_spanned(iov[i].iov_base, s);
page_list->base_address = iov[i].iov_base;
page_list->pages = pages;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 16:53 [PATCH] dma: get_user_pages -> get_user_pages_fast Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-11 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 11:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-10-12 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012115257.GA24389@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox